Dr. Ryan Nuehofel illustrates what life would be like if we paid for food the same way that we pay for healthcare. The ridiculousness of it highlights the absurdity of healthcare procurement and really hits a home run in its depiction of how we have gotten ourselves into the mess of a healthcare system most of us despise. This is a must read:
When I share information about Direct Primary Care with others, I’m often met with fierce resistance and disbelief. I’ve even been told that I’m full of, well, you know what! So today, when I saw this interview with Dr. Josh Umbehr of Atlas M.D. I couldn’t wait to share it! Dr. Umbehr shares with us the highlights of Direct Primary Care and how the revolutionary healthcare model is changing the way Americans receive their primary care.
“Direct primary care is the free market applied to health care. It’s medicine finally taking the best elements of other business models such as Amazon Prime, Netflix, and Hulu and applying them to an industry that’s ten or fifteen years behind the rest of the world in terms of business structure. It brings a very high-value, low-cost model to the masses.”
Here are some of the highlights of Direct Primary Care and how it saves money for the masses and fixes access to care, by far the most agregious problem in the healthcare systems of “every other developed country”, as well as in America. (Quotes below from Dr. Josh Umbehr in his interview by Tim White of the Objective Standard)
- Direct Primary Care brings a membership model to healthcare: “We charge $10 per month for kids, or $50 to $100 per month for adults, based on age.”
- Direct Primary Care lowers the cost of health insurance, because it removes the cost of basic care from insurance, saving insurance for the catastrophic claims it should be used for: “Direct primary care makes insuring the routine 80 percent of your health care unnecessary.”
- Direct Primary Care lowers the cost of procedures, prescriptions, labs and x-ray: “My best example is an EKG—it costs thirty-six cents, so we do it for free. The coffee in the waiting room costs more than that.” “Just as Amazon can use its size, technology, and resources to find the best prices for me, we can do the same for patients when it comes to medications and labs. We can get those things wholesale at giant savings, sometimes up to 95 percent off.”
- Direct Primary Care saves money for the chronically ill and those who might need high tech imaging such as CAT, PET or MRI: “A diabetic patient may have trouble getting his A1c testing covered because it’s expensive. We can do that test for $2.25. It’s $150 at most other places. A diabetic can get a thousand pills of Metformin—more than a year’s supply—for $11.” “We may not have in-house the orthopedic surgeon who does the surgery, but we can certainly do the MRI that the surgeon will need. Instead of $3,000, we do it for $300.”
- Direct Primary Care provides quality healthcare: “There’s “cost-effective” health care, which would say, “Don’t do mammograms until you’re forty-five or fifty,” depending on what guideline you use. Well, if you have a family history of breast cancer and you’re worried about it, you might start doing mammograms at forty. Some people will say you’re not cost effective, but I say, “That’s what the patient wanted, and it’s $75 for a mammogram through a direct primary care provider. She can comfortably afford it, and it buys her peace of mind—that’s quality care.”
- Direct Primary Care provides value to its patients: “The nausea medicine Zofran, prescribed to pregnant women for morning sickness, is around $120 for thirty pills. We get it wholesale for $2.65.” “Doctors can order brand-name newborn diapers wholesale for $0.02 per diaper. We can get a case of 240 diapers for even less at $3.77—it sells for $38 on Amazon.” DPCs resell wholesale items like diapers and prescriptions to their patients at cost; they do not mark them up.
- Direct Primary Care routinely saves patients thousands on emergency or urgent care. Consider this tweet from a Dr Janice M Hudson, MD.
In conclusion, we as Americans can do better than “other developed countries”, and what makes us different is freedom. If the government would allow us to buy wraparound insurance to protect us from unforeseen catastrophes, healthcare in America would once again become affordable for the masses, freeing us from waste so that we could use money saved to protect those who are truly in need.
The High Cost of Health Insurance – Explained
One of the frequent debates I run across with people when discussing healthcare reform is the common misconception that Free Markets (profit) caused health insurance, and thus healthcare, to become expensive beyond reach for most Americans.
On the contrary, it wasn’t free markets at all, but rather government meddling, that caused America’s Healthcare cost woes. But to understand this, one must delve into the history of health insurance in America.
My friend, Dr. Paul Hsieh, does a phonemenol job of documenting this history, in his white paper, Moral Healthcare vs. “Universal HealthCare”.
This document provides an incredibly detailed picture of the historical events dating all the way back to the Great Depression, that led us to rampant healthcare cost inflation. Very few Americans and non-Americans have a clear understanding or picture of these historical events and thus, naturally conclude that free markets are evil, uncaring entities that leave fellow citizens to “die in the streets”.
A brief excerpt from Dr. Paul Hsieh’s writing creates an analogy to describe the common sense outcome of what would happen to homeowner’s insurance, if we used it in the same way that we use health insurance :
“To understand this, consider that homeowners generally pay for their own house maintenance such as lawn work, painting, and remodeling. Routine maintenance is not covered by homeowners insurance; only damages resulting from a tornado, fire, vandals, or some other catastrophic event are covered. But suppose the government suddenly decreed that it would exempt from income taxes any money spent on homeowners insurance. This would reduce taxes for insurance-paid repairs. Accordingly, people would seek insurance policies that cover routine home maintenance, such as painting, carpet replacement, and fence and deck maintenance—and insurers would provide them. Although these new policies would cost more, they would seem on the surface to be a bargain because homeowners would be spending untaxed dollars. Demand for home repairs would skyrocket. More money would be spent on home maintenance, and the cost of home insurance would quickly outpace that of other goods and services. To remain in business, home insurers would limit coverage for more expensive repairs. Simultaneously, to curry favor with their constituents, politicians would seek mandates to expand coverage, and, of course, they would demand further regulations to make sure that poor homeowners had “access” to homeowners insurance. This is precisely what has happened with health insurance.”
Believe it or not, routine healthcare and chronic healthcare is incredibly affordable when it’s not insured, and when it is provided in the free market (meaning that the actual consumer of the care pays for the care – not an insurance plan or the government). And when insurance plans can mitigate the risk of pre-existing conditions and not have to pay super-inflated prices for routine healthcare, like lab, chemistry, or a physical, they suddenly become very affordable too, providing peace of mind for the statistically unlikely catastrophic medical event.
Compare the charges pictured below from a hospital to an insured patient vs. the cost of the same services, provided from a direct primary care (DPC) doctor, Epiphany Health, that takes direct payment from the consumer. Imagine what the total annual spend per person in America would be if everyone used direct primary care instead of insurance to pay for routine healthcare. I don’t think even Canadians would be able to boast such low costs. Is it really morally superior to impose a $10,000 tax on your neighbors (Canadians consistently remind me their care costs about half what we pay for our hospital charges) than pay out of your own pocket in the free market for something that would really only cost about $280?
Hospital Cost billed to 3rd party payer vs. Free Market Cost for same procedures
I’ve often been told by Americans and non-Americans alike that free market healthcare is immoral, and that we should do what every other “developed country” does and adopt a single-payer healthcare system, where the government pays for, and thus controls the healthcare system, providing “equal and excellent” quality care to all fellow citizens. But is the quality really “excellent ”? Read some of these stories on Twitter, #Canadawaits. (If you’re Canadian, you will presumably tell me that these cases are ‘anecdotal’ and not representative of your system. You’ll tell me I need to so some research, which you’ll assume I have not done). I suppose universal healthcare is perceived to be “excellent care”, when you’ve never been exposed to free market healthcare before.
“The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.” — Winston Churchill
Direct Primary Care (Free Market Healthcare)
But once you’ve had a taste of what free market healthcare is like (especially if you’ve been on a wait list), then, like me, you’ll just want to share it with everyone, and you’ll want to find ways to expand it. After all, a rising tide raises all boats, like a booming economy raises people from poverty, like affordable, high-quality healthcare becomes accessible to nearly everyone, while freeing taxpayers to use their money for other worthy causes, such as providing charity to family or those in need (ideally a very, very small segment of society in a free country). Oops, did just I say “nearly” everyone? (oh, the hypocrisy)! Yep, that’s right, I said, “nearly” everyone. In a free economy, there is some inequity, but, free market healthcare would be accessible to the masses, without the negative consequences of taxation or the need for health insurance for routine medical expenses. Catastrophes would be covered by affordable “True” health insurance, without the requirement of extorting hard-earned income from your neighbor. For the very small number of poverty stricken households, charity and safety net programs will provide equally good care, without the worry of waiting or government restrictions.
How Healthcare Should Be
We do not have free markets for healthcare right now, in America. Wait! What?? There are small pockets of free market healthcare popping up here and there, but what an amazing thing it would be if free markets in healthcare were the norm.
A lot of changes would need to be made in America to achieve the goal of free market healthcare. The necessary changes are discussed in this Kindle book, written by Dr. James Brook. It’s no simple matter, but it can be done, if enough people are willing to take the time and learn about the things that got us into our healthcare cost predicament in the first place.
If you want to learn about single payer healthcare, whether or not you should vote for it, or if you want to learn about American Healthcare history, I implore you to take the time to read the recommended books and white papers provided to you for free on this blog. You’re a voter. Learn before you vote!